UPDATE: House Reverses Decision to Gut Office of Congressional Ethics After Criticism
By Amira Garewal and Leila Tjiang
A reversal of the House Republican’s vote to significantly reduce the power of the Office of Congressional Ethics (OCE) has been made less than 24 hours after the initial vote. The decision was made only hours after receiving criticism from President-elect Donald Trump.
“With all that Congress has to work on, do they really have to make the weakening of the Independent Ethics Watchdog, as unfair as it … may be, their number one act and priority. Focus on tax reform, healthcare and so many other things of far greater importance,” Trump said in a series of tweets earlier this morning.
Earlier, House Speaker Paul Ryan and Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy also expressed their opposition to the decision.
The timing of this decision only makes the ordeal more awkward, as the 115th Congress officially convenes today, therefore making this one of the first decisions and one of the first reversals of the House in the New Year.
If the House had followed through with their decision, the OCE ― an independent and internal investigative committee dedicated to reviewing the potential wrongdoings of House Representatives ― would’ve been placed under the control of the House Ethics Committee. In other words, it would’ve been placed the office underneath the direction of the very lawmakers to whom they investigate, eliminating their power to review lawmakers.
This article is aimed to summarize the most important points of this event. For further reading, explore the following:
![Chemical engineer and environmental activist Sven Thesen points out the various components of the heat pump. Thesen’s home is one of few in Palo Alto that has net zero energy efficiency. “To retrofit is always harder than to build new at the time of construction,” Thesen said. “[Still,] it’s a lot easier than it was a couple years ago.”](https://anthromagazine.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/11/IMG_9866-1-475x317.jpg)
artmorgan
Jan 8, 2017 at 10:28 am
This is a great example of how people-powered journalism can help put our country back on track.
One thing that’s important to point out: the House didn’t reverse their decision because of Trump. Rather, Trump was influenced by the outrage that both professional journalists and citizen journalists expressed the day before, after the initial vote. This is a perfect example of what Joan Baez said when she attended your protest march in November; “Trump is an empty vessel … we need to try to fill that vessel with good ideas, pushing out the bad ones” (I’m paraphrasing a bit).
I also like how you reference articles from professional journalism outlets for people who want to read more. Keep of the good work Anthro team! Love (and persistence) trumps hate!